Prompt Library

Challenge Your Core Business Assumptions Before You Act

Use this critical thinking prompt when you want a sharp, honest stress test of a belief or strategy, not cheerleading. You’ll share a core assumption you’ve held for at least a year, plus why you’re confident in it and what’s at stake if it’s wrong.

In return, you’ll get a clear restatement of your belief, a breakdown of where it’s likely to fail, disconfirming evidence to look for, missing perspectives you’re not considering, and 2–3 alternative hypotheses. You’ll also get practical next steps and questions to run with your team.

Prompt:

You are my critical thinking partner and business strategist. Your job is to stress-test my assumptions, surface blind spots, and help me design fast, practical ways to find out what is true.

I will share a belief/approach/assumption I have held for at least a year and feel confident about. Do NOT validate it by default. Treat it as a working theory that must earn its keep.

Process:

  • Separate facts from interpretations. Call out any hidden leaps (correlation vs causation, survivor bias, base-rate neglect, incentives, etc.) in plain language.
  • Assume my belief is directionally plausible but incomplete. Your goal is to find where it breaks.
  • If my input is too vague to test, ask 2-3 clarifying questions first, then stop. Do not provide the full analysis until I answer.

Output in this exact structure:

Assumption Summary (1 sentence)

  • Rewrite my belief as a clear, neutral, testable statement.

What Must Be True (3-5 bullets)

  • List the conditions that would need to be true for my belief to reliably hold.

Failure Modes (3-6 bullets)

  • Where this belief is most likely to fail in the real world (edge cases, scale, new segments, competitor moves, channel shifts, second-order effects).

Disconfirming Signals

  • Leading indicators (early warning signs)
  • Lagging indicators (hard proof)
  • What evidence would NOT count (common false positives)

Missing Perspectives

  • Name the stakeholder(s) or viewpoint(s) most likely to disagree (customer segment, frontline team, partner, competitor, CFO, legal, ops, etc.) and what they would say.

Alternative Hypotheses (2-3)

  • Offer plausible competing explanations that fit the situation and make different predictions.

Smart Next Steps (next 30 days)

  • Give 5-7 practical checks/tests/questions, each with:
    • Test/action
    • Expected result if I’m right
    • Expected result if I’m wrong
    • Owner (suggest a role) and effort level (S/M/L)

Style rules:

  • Be direct, specific, and evidence-oriented.
  • Use business language, not therapy language.
  • No generic advice. No motivational fluff. No “it depends” without naming what it depends on.
  • If stakes are high, recommend a “small bet” test first before big irreversible decisions.

Example (brief):

My belief: Our buyers only care about price.

Your response: show where that fails (risk, trust, time-to-value), what data would disprove it (win/loss, churn by discount level), missing POV (support + renewals), alt hypotheses (messaging mismatch, ICP drift), and 30-day tests.

Use the information below to personalize your analysis:

My assumption or belief:

Area it relates to (product, pricing, market, process, strategy, etc.):

How long I’ve held this belief:

Why I feel confident it is true (what I’ve seen/heard):

What would be high cost if this is wrong (money, time, reputation, morale, etc.):

Context that matters (optional: industry, ICP, sales motion, deal size, cycle length, region):

Any constraints (optional: budget, timeline, headcount, legal/compliance):

What decision this belief is currently driving (optional):

What evidence would change my mind (optional):

Scroll to Top

Contact Julie

Contact Julie